|
Field development cost, risk and economics optimisation |
antium |
|
Achieving a
reliable, auditable and timely estimate of oilfield development cost, risk
and economics is a daunting task. Multiple
concepts, options, technologies and layouts can lead to a potential
'combinatorial explosion' of information. A
multidisciplinary team, working against tight deadlines, on fast evolving
designs, runs the risk of misdirected effort, information overload and
uncertainty. Integrating data
from diverse disciplines, each with its own culture, into a consistent body
of decision support data is a real challenge. |
The challenges are addressed by the antium methodology. The methodology enables an integrated project team to arrive at an optimum field development plan, taking into consideration cost, risk and economics. The client team
benefits from clear, timely, decision-support information on which to base
economic assessments. Managers of
pre-sanction projects have the metrics needed to monitor progress, direct
effort and manage uncertainty. The project team
remains confident that the body of underlying project data is consistent,
well ordered, transparent and fully auditable. |
|
Features: · Rigorous costing methodology · Team-working framework for multi-disciplinary teams of engineers and specialists. · Advanced information techniques for data collection, analysis and reporting. |
Benefits: · Reliable, auditable and timely decision support information. · Optimisation of field concept, layout, configuration and phasing. · Risk assessment and opportunity identification · Understanding of field development economics ·
Reduced time and effort to perform
pre-sanction projects. |
|
|
Multi dimensional reporting. |
|
|
Cost evolution and audit trail |
|
|
Geographic information systems |
|
|
Phasing |
|
|
Vessel scheduling and utilisation |
|
|
Component cost model |
|
|
Rigor of database system |
|
|
Integrated approach to field development |
|
|
Revenue phasing |
|
antium |
|